"Stan Hardegree -> Earl Croasmun"  wrote in
news:14843$POL_DISORDER{at}JamNNTPd:

 ~>> This recent Supreme Court ruling is literally the very
 ~>> definition of fascism as defined by Benito Mussolini.

 EC>> Sauer doesn't understand what fascism is.  Why don't you help him
 SH> out? EC> What is the definition of fascism?  Mussolini's definition.
 SH> The literal EC> definition.  The "very" definition.

 EC>> Now, could you next explain why the Court ruling is the "very"
 SH> definition?

 EC>> This could be amusing.

 SH> I'm making some popcorn.

Contrary to Wayne's raving, this SC ruling is not fascist.

In fact the only SC ruling I can think of that *WAS* fascist in nature was
the Dred Scott ruling, which pretty much stated, "The US is whites only,
n****** don't count."

Now, as to this ruling, just something to remember here:

This ruling lets unions and even Hugo Chavez dump as much money as they
want to to any candidate they want to.

Just something to think about...

--- Xnews/5.04.25