Ed Hulett -> Ross Sauer wrote:
 EH> Ross Sauer -> Stan Hardegree wrote:
 RS>> "Stan Hardegree -> Earl Croasmun"
 wrote in
 RS>> news:14843$POL_DISORDER{at}JamNNTPd:

 ~>>>> This recent Supreme Court ruling is literally the very
 ~>>>> definition of fascism as defined by Benito Mussolini.

 EC>>>> Sauer doesn't understand what fascism is.  Why don't you help him
 SH>>> out? EC> What is the definition of fascism?  Mussolini's
definition.
 SH>>> The literal EC> definition.  The "very" definition.

 EC>>>> Now, could you next explain why the Court ruling is the
"very"
 SH>>> definition?

 EC>>>> This could be amusing.

 SH>>> I'm making some popcorn.

 RS>> Contrary to Wayne's raving, this SC ruling is not fascist.

 RS>> In fact the only SC ruling I can think of that *WAS* fascist in
 EH> nature was
 RS>> the Dred Scott ruling, which pretty much stated, "The US is whites
 EH> only,
 RS>> n****** don't count."

 EH> Why do you insist on showing the world you have no earthly clue what
 EH> fascism is?

 RS>> Now, as to this ruling, just something to remember here:

 RS>> This ruling lets unions and even Hugo Chavez dump as much money as
 EH> they
 RS>> want to to any candidate they want to.

 RS>> Just something to think about...

 EH> You are an absolute idiot.


Not only did Otto show his ignorance (yet again), bur he (yet again)
demonstrated his flaming bigoty. He could have said that slaves or
Africans, he chose to accidently bare it for us to all see.

--- Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)