| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Modem Test |
Hello John! On 30 May 94, you said to Geoff Armstrong: GA>> .................... It'll remain to be seen if this is the GA>> case, tho. JL> That's the point I'm making. Too often predictions are made in the JL> computer industry which never bear fruit. I'm more inclined to think JL> that the first batch of V.34 compliant modems will provide limited JL> V.FC compatability, whilst later models will do-away with V.FC JL> compliance alltogether. I'd think that if they went to the trouble of putting in the compatability mode for V.FC into V.34, they'd leave it there, but I guess it (taking it out later) could be used as a lever to force upgrades of the ROM and datapump. GA>> As 80% of modems using V.FC use the Rockwell chipset, it GA>> looks like it'll be Ok. JL> For the short term - Yes. The Long term - doubtful at best. Oh well, in that case I got a good 14.4k modem for $350 dollars, in which case it's still a good buy. Sea Ewes are round! Geoff. --- FMail 0.92* Origin: Point Percy! (Brisbane, Australia) (3:711/934.14) SEEN-BY: 711/934 @PATH: 711/934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.