48) UFOs SEEN BY SHUTTLE 
ASTRONAUTS
A video tape exists that shows the NASA control center at Houston, Texas, on
the 18 Feb, 1997. On the tape, a conversation can be heard between two of
NASA's astronauts on the Shuttle. The conversation took place after a space
walk to repair the Hubble te
lescope. It goes as follows:-
1) "What a flash....?"
2) "What'd say Mark?"
3) "I saw a light flash.....(unintelligible)......There it is again."
4) "I thought it must of been me....."
5) "What"
6) "I thought it was my imagination...."
7) "I saw it too, so it's not..."
8) "There's two of them."
9) "There's another one."
10) "What are they?"
11) "I think I saw lights flickering in here...."
12) "Who'd be taking pictures?"
13) "What is this?"
14) "It's just gone past in front of us...."
15) "Further lights."
16) "Which ones?"
17) "I lost surveillance for a second, but had veillance the whole
time....(unintelligible)".
18) "Gone up."
Then on the tape, a NASA controller got up from his desk, walked over to
another part of the control room and cut off communication the Shuttle and
earth. He probably didn't want anyone to hear anymore.
The official explanation of what the conversation on the Shuttle was about, 
was
that the astronauts were talking about some lights on a control panel in the
Shuttle.
Do America's astronauts not know what lights on a control panel look like, as
it seems on the tape? Can lights from a control panel fly off in front of 
hem
as we can read in the transcript? I don't think so. It is very clear that the
astronauts saw UFOs.
 The lights that were flickering in the Shuttle were probably the UFOs doing
this, it is a regular occurrence in UFO encounters.
                                                   49) RAF WOODBRIDGE 
ENCOUNTER
At RAF Bentwaters and RAF Woodbridge (twin US Air force bases) an encounter
with a UFO happened in 1980. Here is an official report given to the Ministry
of Defence by Charles Halt deputy base commander, US Air Force:-
Subject: Unexplained lights.
To: RAF/CC
1) Early in the morning of 27 Dec 80 (approximately 0300L), two USAF security
police patrolmen saw unusual lights outside the gate at RAF Woodbridge.
Thinking an aircraft might have crashed or been forced down, they called for
permission to go outside the
 gate to investigate. The on-duty flight chief responded and allowed three
patrolmen to proceed on foot. The individuals reported seeing a strange 
glowing
object in the forest. The object was described as being metallic in 
ppearance
and triangular in sha
pe, approximately two to three meters across the base and approximately two
meters high. It illuminated the entire forest with white light. The object
itself had a pulsing light on top and a bank(s) of blue lights underneath. 
he
object was hovering or on
 legs. As the patrolmen approached the object, it manoeuvred through the 
rees
and disappeared. At this time the animals on a nearby farm went into a 
renzy.
The object was briefly sighted approximately an hour later near the back 
ate.
2) The next day, three depressions one and a half inches deep and seven 
nches
in diameter were found where the object had been sighted on the ground. The
following night (29 Dec 80) the area was checked for radiation. Beta/gamma
readings of 0.1 milliroen
tgens were recorded with peak readings in the centre of the triangle formed 
y
the depression. A nearby tree had moderate (.05-.07) readings on the side of
the tree toward the depressions.
3) Later in the night a red sun-like light was seen through the trees. It 
moved
about and pulsed. At one point it appeared to throw off glowing particles and
then broke into five separate white objects and then disappeared. Immediately
thereafter, three s
tar-like objects were noticed in the sky, two objects to the north and one to
the south, all of which were about 10 degrees off the horizon. The objects
moved rapidly in sharp angular movements and displayed red, green and blue
lights. The objects to the
north appeared to be elliptical through an 8-12 power lens. They then turned 
to
full circles. The objects to the north remained in the sky for an hour or 
more.
The object to the south was visible for two or three hours and beamed down a
stream of light fr
om time to time. Numerous individuals, including the undersigned, witnessed 
the
activities in paragraphs 2 and 3.
It has been reported that the patrolmen that went into the forest on the 
ight
of the sighting; lost about four hours of time. This is typical of alien
abductions where people are taken on board a craft for a certain amount of
time, then hypnotised to for
get about the whole thing. They are then put back to where they had been 
before
the abduction. The result is that the person can not account for the missing
time.
The cover-up instigators (some pretending to be Ufologists which are 
entioned
in the section : How the Government could control UFO information) claim that
the soldiers saw the local lighthouse, and not a UFO/alien craft. The 
oldiers
managed to get abov
e normal radiation recordings and copies of the indentations (by using a hard
setting liquid) left on the ground where the craft had landed. There were 
three
indentations/holes left by the craft which made a triangle on the ground. The
cover-up instigator
s (which are against the E.Ts called : Grand Order of Development (GOD), 
hich
don't want anyone to believe in E.Ts like GOD wants) are not living in the 
real
world if they think the public will swallow the lighthouse explanation or
similar. One explanati
on given by a controversial Ufologist called : Jenny Randles; had all types 
f
things included within it. She said on a TV show that the soldiers saw parts 
of
a Russian satellite burning up, a lighthouse and a top secret radar system
being used all at onc
e, which resulted in their UFO encounter. If Jenny Randles would have 
mentioned
the appearance of Father Christmas in the middle of her explanation of the
sighting , it would not have surprised me.
                                                                         50)
HOAXES
I think that the main people who perpetrate hoaxes in the UFO field, are the
people In the Government/Freemasons that are covering up the UFO phenomena.
What I believe they do; is they get someone to pretend to be a contactee
(someone in contact with E.Ts
) etc, they then fake some proof of contact; like pictures. Then a major
publicity campaign is mounted to get as many people in the public to believe
that the person (fake contactee) is for real, and he is in contact with E.Ts.
After everyone has took the
 bait and believed in the hoax, they then pretend to find proof that the
contactee was a hoaxer. The UFO community and general public get to hear 
bout
the finding of proof; that the story of contact was all a hoax. The people 
ho
believed in the hoax are
 less willing to take other contact cases seriously, as they have the 
ttitude
that they have been stung once and that it wasn't going to happen again. The
result is that the general public go along with the Government's 
disinformation
that everything to
do with UFOs is all a hoax, and Ufologists tend not to believe in certain 
types
of UFO cases. In the UFO field, there has been talk that George Adamski (a
famous 1950s UFO contactee) was set up to be a fake contactee by the CIA
(Central Intelligence Agenc
y of the USA). I must say here (for people in the know) that the case of Ed
Walters of Gulf Breeze is not a hoax (read UFOs over Gulf Breeze, Florida, 
or
more on this).
It is very easy to spot a hoaxed piece of film footage. Computers can be used
to see if there are any wires holding a model up for example. Computers can
also be used to spot the more convincing hoaxes. If a computer has been used 
to
create a hoax, it lea
ves an imprint between the frames of the video tape. The imprint left is of 
the
computer program used to create the hoax.
If you think that it is easy to hoax a piece of film footage, you are wrong.
The makers of the top Hollywood special effects films can't make computers
generate totally convincing effects, So what chance have the general public 
got
of doing this?
If a piece of UFO footage has any of the cameraman's/women's voice on it, 
voice
stress evaluation can be used to see if the camera person is lying or not. In
the case of the footage of a crop-circle being formed, along with four small
UFOs, the person fil
ming was found to be genuine.
                                                                         51)
THE MOON
If you compare the Earth to our Moon, you should notice something. The Moon 
s
covered with craters and the Earth is not. E.Ts have told us through 
channelled
information; that the Moon did not belong to Earth originally. Could the E.Ts
have put the Moon
in orbit around Earth? Did they take it from somewhere where meteorite 
howers
are the norm, and this is the reason for the craters. From what I have 
earned
about the capabilities of the E.Ts, I wouldn't be surprised if they did. 
ould
the object called
Karla; that appeared by surprise at the edge of our solar system, in 1993 or
1994; be one of the things that could move a Moon? (Karla is 150 miles 
across).
I am not an expert in astronomy or anything , but I don't think that things
just appear at the edg
e of the solar system (like Karla did) these days without us knowing about it
first. As far as I know, Karla does not have a tail like a comet would have, 
it
is just supposed to be a large ball. Could Karla be the real Death Star from
the Star Wars films?
 There are Grays and a Big Foot in the film just to mention a few links I 
ave
come up with.
When writing the above, the fact that the earth has an atmosphere and the 
oon
has not ; has been taken into consideration.
                                                                   52) THE 
EN
IN BLACK
The men in black are people that used to threaten UFO witnesses into not
telling anyone about seeing UFOs. These days there are hardly any reports of
these mysterious men. In the early 90s, however, one person said that they 
were
payed a visit by the Men
in black. The person said that they had Masonic symbols on their lapels
(collars). In this case it was the Eye of Lucifer inside a pyramid. If the
Freemasons are not responsible for the Men In Black, someone wants us to 
hink
they are.
I have been told by a UFO investigator about an encounter he had that 
eatured
men similar to the Men In Black. He said that he was near a farm house (which 
I
visited with him) when he saw a large white glowing UFO descend behind the 
farm
house he was nea
r. He went to have a closer look , and when he did this he saw men with 
machine
guns (he thought they were machine guns). He promptly telephoned the police 
and
they came out to him but the men and UFO had gone. To this day he has not got 
a
clue what these
 men were or what they were doing at the farm. I personally think that these
men were the Men in Black that people have reported seeing in the past. I do
not think that these men are from the Government or anything similar. I think
it is more probable tha
t these men are a part of GOD, and their job is to get rid of anyone who is
against GOD. See : UFOs and religion for more on GOD.
There is numerical proof which links the Men in Black with the Freemason's
special number 33. In the music video for the film : Men in Black, when the
dancers (that are acting as the Men in Black) are stood in a circle, there is 
a
total of 33 dancers, whi
ch is the top degree of Freemasonry (see Freemasons, UFOs and God along with
Channelled information in this text for more on the Freemasons and the number
---
---------------