From: "Robert Comer" 

> Why take away arbitrary components?

I'm not, I was just adding the other conditions to the known ones.

--
Bob Comer





"Phil Payne"  wrote in
message news:44d0a92e$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>
> "Robert Comer"  wrote in message
> news:44d09f58{at}w3.nls.net...
>> > OK so they took on & beat the vast bulk of the german
forces (75%+).
>>
>> Russian ground forces, I have no dispute on that fact, but it wouldn't
> have
>> been that way without the other front.
>>
>> > everyone else, (the US, UK, French, Greeks, Yugoslavs etc etc) had to
>> > divide the remaining 25%- between them.
>>
>> That's a VERY simple (and wrong) way of looking at it.  Thought
>> experiment -- what happens when you take away the western front, move all
>> those forces to the east, give Germany back its manufacturing capacity
>> and
>> an overwhelming airforce, take away western aid to Russia, including
>> military aid.
>
> Back to Ribbentrop (and he oughta know better than either of us):
>
> a) Red Army
> b) US logistics
> c) Lack of air superiority in the West
>
> Why take away arbitrary components?
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5