| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: qwk restriction |
-=> On 04-11-15 09:28, Chad Adams wrote to All <=-
CA> {at}MSGID:
CA> {at}TZ: 412c
CA> I set the qwk networking to yes. if a new
CA> user selects yes to qwk account then no on
CA> the confirmation, the q restriction is
CA> still set. Does anyone else have this
CA> issue?
New users should not accept the qwk account option unless they're planning on
using a QWKnet to do mail transfers via QNET-FTP.
Also see if you have *Q* still active in the New User Values. SCFG > System >
New User Values.
--
Bill
Telnet: tequilamockingbirdonline.net
Web: bbs.tequilamockingbirdonline.net
FTP: ftp.tequilamockingbirdonline.net:2121
IRC: irc.tequilamockingbirdonline.net Ports: 6661-6670 SSL: +6697
Radio: radio.tequilamockingbirdonline.net:8010/live
... Look Twice...Save a Life!! Motorcycles are Everywhere!!
--- MultiMail/Win32 v0.50
* Origin: TequilaMockingbird Online - Toms River, NJ (1:266/404)SEEN-BY: 15/0 34/999 90/1 103/705 116/18 120/302 331 544 123/140 1970 130/20 SEEN-BY: 138/146 140/1 14 153/736 7715 154/10 203/0 218/700 220/60 221/0 1 6 SEEN-BY: 222/2 229/310 426 230/150 240/1120 5832 249/206 250/1 261/38 100 SEEN-BY: 266/404 512 267/155 275/100 280/464 1027 5003 5555 282/1031 1056 SEEN-BY: 291/1 292/624 854 908 310/31 320/119 219 322/757 340/400 342/77 200 SEEN-BY: 393/68 396/45 423/120 633/0 267 280 281 412 640/1384 712/848 770/1 SEEN-BY: 801/161 189 2320/100 3634/12 5020/1042 @PATH: 266/404 261/38 140/1 221/0 280/464 229/426 633/280 267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.