| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | VisualAge C++ for OS/2 |
On Saturday December 26 1998 at 16:49, David Noon wrote to George White: DN> I don't see why I should quadruple my RAM for a compiler. The current DN> VAC++ is already a memory hog with its WorkFrame/2 and Visual Builder. It DN> soaks up all the spare bytes of my current 32MB and pages quite a deal DN> beyond that. I cannot conceive of what IBM did to make the situation even DN> worse. I dunno; maybe they wrote it in interpretive C++ running on a JAVA-based interpreter? Has IBM added any 'killer' features to explain this massive bloat? --- GoldED/2 2.50+* Origin: Life sucks and then you croak. (1:250/820) SEEN-BY: 396/1 632/0 371 633/260 262 267 270 371 635/444 506 728 639/252 SEEN-BY: 670/218 @PATH: 250/820 99 396/1 633/260 635/506 728 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.