| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | A neat summation |
Replying to a message of Gene McAloon to Adam Flinton: GM> From: Gene McAloon >> How so? Is your supreme court "independant" or "appointed"? GM> On the state level, it varies. On the federal level, it is appointed GM> and that for life. It is the latter that guarantees its independence. GM> That explains why who gets appointed is such a political issue GM> starting with Reagan trying to pack the court with far-right GM> extremists as Bush is still doing today. The first executive to try to pack the Supreme Court was Roosevelt minor. And despite the bad press he got his wish anyway, the Court stopped killing his socialist programs - and in the course of his administration he ended up appointing most of the judges on the Court anyway. But once appointed, no one GM> can touch them, especially not the executive branch. The president GM> has no control of the federal bench whatsoever. Congress has some GM> control, mostly through funding and what crimes are to be heard by GM> federal courts, but that is about it and at that rarely exercises GM> what little control it has. True. It's a pity that *both* sides try to pack the court with their own ideologues instead of people who will stick to the Constitution.. ---* Origin: Bob's Soapbox, Plattsmouth, Nebraska, USA (1:379/103.104) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/103 1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.