Re: Test
  By: Michiel van der Vlist to mark lewis on Fri Jun 05 2020 13:17:26


 ml>> @MSGID: 2814.fido-fidotest@1:3634/12 233f62a9

 MvdV> "2814.fido-fidotest@1:3634/12" is not a valid return address
 MvdV> for the originating network, as mandated by FTS-009.

it seems to work perfectly fine in the years it has been being used... granted
the software does not purport to even implement FTS-0009... if it did, then i
would agree with you wholeheartedly...

 ml>> @NOTE: FSEditor.js v1.104

 MvdV> Where is the @NOTE kludge documented?

AFAIK, it was started by some external BBS editor in an effort to get their
software also listed in the stream of message manipulation... it tells what
software created the message without using the tear line and dealing with the
tear line wars...

 ml>> why do you continually whine about these non-problems???

 MvdV> An anomaly does not need to be a problem in order to qualify
 MvdV> for reporting.

i agree with you for real anomalies... these are not such and have been around
in widespread use for decades... limited horizons are not an excuse ;)


)\/(ark
--- SBBSecho 3.11-Linux