| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Modem Test |
Geoff Armstrong wrote in a message to John Logothetis: GA> Rockwell claim that their implementation of V.34 will be GA> backward compatable with their V.FC, so unmodified V.FC GA> Rockwell equiped modems will be able to talk to their V34 GA> modems. Pretty neat. It'll remain to be seen if this is the GA> case, tho. That's the point I'm making. Too often predictions are made in the computer industry which never bear fruit. I'm more inclined to think that the first batch of V.34 compliant modems will provide limited V.FC compatability, whilst later models will do-away with V.FC compliance alltogether. GA> As 80% of modems using V.FC use the Rockwell chipset, it GA> looks like it'll be Ok. For the short term - Yes. The Long term - doubtful at best. John. --- timEd/2-B11* Origin: Pendantic Point (3:711/934.10) SEEN-BY: 711/934 @PATH: 711/934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.