On Sun, 15 Feb 2015 18:09:59 +0000 (UTC), Diesel wrote:
> Jax news:XnsA442A271BBC1FJAX@
> 127.0.0.1 Sun, 15 Feb 2015 15:58:08 GMT in alt.comp.anti-virus, wrote:
>
>> Just saying.
>
> you're intentionally misleading people.
>
> Yep. It's only gotten four votes, let's checkout the comments:
>
> The first person to vote for it is clearly showing their IT
> incompetence.. Read:
>
> June 02, 2008 | By Web Bird
>
> | Version: BugHunter 2.2
>
> Pros
>
> Don't really know.
>
> Cons
>
> Downloaded to a zip file, opened it and that's as far as it got. It
> must have disappeared into cyber space. Tried again, same result.
>
> Summary
>
> null
>
> Updated on Dec 15, 2008
>
> Same as above and I opened it ok. It's the worst program that I've
> ever used. Don't bother to download it. There are no malware or
> virus's (the program is clean that I know of). It's just difficult to
> understand. Don't bother with it.
>
> Updated on Dec 15, 2008
>
> Wormguard informed me that it has blocked BugHunter from loading
> because it regarded it as a problem. So don't touch it!!!
>
>
> *** I don't know what wormguard is. I do know that BugHunter is clean,
> so the program had no legit reason to block it. The fact this user
> couldn't follow simple unzip into an empty folder instructions tells
> you the value of their vote.
>
> Here's the second 'review':
>
>
>
> "very nice antimalware app"
>
> August 23, 2007 | By redneckrockerphil
>
> | Version: BugHunter 2.2
>
> Pros
>
> this is a very good antimalware app, as a freelance computer
> technician i like to have some antimalware apps that i can copy to a
> floppy and take with me to a job, and this is able to do just that. it
> checks files againts a very comprehensive database of known malware
> and gives you the option to ignore, disable or remove known malware,
> and since it's DOS based i'm able to scan an entire computer without
> having to install it, very nice
>
> Cons
>
> none so far
>
> h0h0h0
>
> Those are the only two reviews left on cnet.com. One is clearly from a
> user who isn't able to follow instructions and clearly, didn't
> understand how to use the program. Infact, they never got it running.
>
> The other person to leave a review is obviously, a tech; which was the
> intended audience for BugHunter. they evidently, had no problem using
> it, understood what it was meant for, and happily gave it 5 stars for
> the work it does. *BIG GLOATING GRIN*
Which means nothing. Do you know his skillset? Nope. Bet your Mum thinks it
wicked as well. Jeese.
>> A user rating of less than 3 stars is not exactly very good. Think
>> about it.
>
> Well, it's a DOS based program. It loses stars for lack of point
> click. The no mouse confuses some people. :) So it doesn't get posh
> awards for eye candy it doesn't have. The idea of unzipping and being
> able to run it without installing is confusing for some as well.
> Proof? The first cnet 'review'. [g]
>
> When rated for it's functionality over user interface, you get this:
>
> http://www.completelyfreesoftware.com/reviews/du_w31_BUGHUN.html
>
>
> http://www.completelyfreesoftware.com/du1_w31.html
> (That's a five star award you're seeing [g])
>
> Review date: August 31, 2006
> Version reviewed: 1.9.2 (see Updates below)
> NOTE: the review only pertains to the version/date mentioned above.
> Subsequent versions could be quite different from the reviewed
> version.
> Review:
>
> BugHunter is an antispyware tool to assist in finding and removing
> malicious software, often called "malware" (some browser & desktop hi
> jacking programs, including keyloggers, adware modules, spyware
> modules, trojans & dialers).
>
> This is a tiny DOS utility that scans your computer and reports,
> and/or removes, instances of malware. You can use this program within
> Windows but, occasionally, it cannot remove some malware without being
> used in DOS. You can put it in a bootable floppy disk (or CD) and
> launch it from pure DOS, but normally it can be used from within
> Windows (up to and including Windows XP) to track down and delete or
> rename the vast majority of malware.
>
> BugHunter works from a list of over 1,000 malicious files (EXE files,
> VB files, OCX, files, DLL files, etc) and the author has promised to
> update that list regularly. Of course, if a malware file isn't on the
> list it won't get flagged but it will still get all the ones that are
> on the list.
>
> Scanning is not fast and you can expect to be waiting some 15 minutes
> while it scans your computer (time depends on how many files it has to
> check).
>
> The opening screen (a DOS box under Windows) offers a choice of 4
> options - scan for malware only, scan for malware and rename it, scan
> for malware and remove it, and exit. Make your choice by typing in the
> appropriate letter (A, B, C or Q).
>
> Initially we just scanned our system using BugHunter and 27 malware
> files were found. We believe that these were simply left over DLLs
> from previous programs which were removed from the computer and they
> were not active (there was no program to launch them). This initial
> scan did not name these 27 files, and the scan took just over 11
> minutes.
>
> We then went to option C on the list, scan and remove, and it reported
> that 27 files were found, and 27 were deleted. This second scan took
> just over 9 minutes.
>
> BugHunter is an excellent tool and one that all Internet users with
> PCs should run regularly. We were disappointed that it did not name
> the "suspect" files, or that it did not give us the option of deleting
> some and not others.
>
> It would have been easy to include a Pause with an instruction to wait
> for the user to either skip, delete or rename the file before
> proceeding. This places the control back in the hands of the user and,
> if there is any question about a suspect file, its name could be
> searched through the Internet (Googled) to see what was written about
> it. Alternatively you can simply do a scan and then check the logfile
> for the files targeted.
>
> BugHunter is a "must have" for all PC users.
>
> Grab a copy now!
>
> Hey, thanks for checking my BugHunter program out though. It was
> officially discontinued in 2008, so I question the legitimacy of this
> thread. [g]
LOL. Too funny. You could put a turd on the Internet and someone would give
it five stars.
--
p-0.0-h the cat
Internet Terrorist, Mass sock puppeteer, Agent provocateur, Gutter rat,
Devil incarnate, Linux user#666, BaStarD hacker, Resident evil, Monkey Boy,
Certifiable criminal, Spineless cowardly scum, textbook Psychopath,
the SCOURGE, l33t p00h d3 tr0ll, p00h == lam3r, p00h == tr0ll, troll
infâme, the OVERCAT [The BEARPAIR are dead, and we are its
murderers], lowlife troll, shyster [pending approval by STATE_TERROR],
cripple, sociopath, kook, smug prick, smartarse, arsehole, moron, idiot,
imbecile, snittish scumbag, liar, total ******* retard, and shill.
Honorary SHYSTER and FRAUD awarded for services to Haberdashery.
By Appointment to God Frank-Lin.
Signature integrity check
md5 Checksum: be0b2a8c486d83ce7db9a459b26c4896
--- NewsGate v1.0 gamma 2
* Origin: News Gate @ Net396 -Huntsville, AL - USA (1:396/4)
|