| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Modem Test |
Hello John! On 28 May 94, you said to Rod Speed: JL> Yeah, but the question still remains: - Will V.34 be backward JL> compatible with V.FC or will V.FC become a redundant proprietary JL> protocol?. I suspect the latter. Rockwell claim that their implementation of V.34 will be backward compatable with their V.FC, so unmodified V.FC Rockwell equiped modems will be able to talk to their V34 modems. Pretty neat. It'll remain to be seen if this is the case, tho. As 80% of modems using V.FC use the Rockwell chipset, it looks like it'll be Ok. Sea Ewes are round! Geoff. --- FMail 0.92* Origin: Point Percy! (Brisbane, Australia) (3:711/934.14) SEEN-BY: 711/934 @PATH: 711/934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.