BJ> appropriate discussion to continue here.  If BinkleyTerm does support
 BJ> it, please point me to the options that take advantage of fileboxes.

 BS>> I was thinking of that, but I'm affraid to damage the style of

 SD> I use BinkleyTerm/2's fileboxes!  This is from my Binkley.CFG:

Ok.  Is this version 2.60 or one of the other lines (XE or...)....

 SD> ; private outbound directory for some specific nodes
 SD> ; all files you put in there will get transmitted and deleted
 SD> ;NodeExtraDir 618:618/2 d:bt\out\george

 SD> I don't use it anymore, but it IS there and it DOES work, folks.

Good....

 SD> There's no need for Squish to be doing this.  BT does 
 SD> it already if I understand this thread correctly...

That's not it.  At least one person would like to see Squish support the
filebox for where it tosses packets.....  As you show, the filebox stuff is
arbitrary directories that have to be specified per node.....  This could
significantly blow up memory used to hold configuration information if used
heavily.....  

Take care.....

Bob Jones, 1:343/41

--- Maximus/2 3.01