| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Exposing the Naturali |
Michael Ragland wrote:
>
> PR:
> In my opinion, the most important result of formalizing natural
> selection has been the discovery on the part of the more astute of its
> practitioners that the explanatory void between the theory of natural
> selection and human nature is even greater and more enigmatic than
> previously imagined. Dawkins has the rare gift of being able to be blunt
> and honest, not only about the virtues of the theory, but also with
> regard to its shortcomings (i.e., the need for a memetics to fill the
> void):
>
> Response:
> I see no explanatory void between the theory of natural selection and
> human nature.
But your the person who made the following remark:
> MR:
> I'd like to think my 'concerns' and 'hopes' go beyond the Darwinian
> imperative of passing on my genes.
>
and this:
> In my case my hopes and concerns are for the continued survival of the
> human species. I realize the way I would like to see reality is not the
> way reality is. Nevertheless, I think I have something to contribute.
While these comments may seem rather mundane from the perspective of what
we have come to expect from our fellow humans, you seem blissfully
ignorant of the fact that such noble motives are currently incomprehensible
from the perspective of the only viable hypothesis we have of the
processes that produced us:
[BEGIN QUOTES]
Be warned that if you wish, as I do, to build a
society in which individuals cooperate generously
and unselfishly towards a common good, you can
expect little help from biological nature. Let
us try to TEACH generosity and altruism, because
WE ARE BORN SELFISH. Let us understand what our
selfish genes are upt to, because we may then at
least have the chance to UPSET THEIR DESIGNS,
SOMETHING THAT NO OTHER SPECIES HAS EVER ASPIRED
TO. (Dawkins) [emphasis mine]
The identification of individuals as the unit of
selection is a central theme in Darwin's thought.
This idea underliees his most radical claim: that
evolution is purposeless and without inherent
direction. ... Evolution does not recognize the 'good'
of the ecosystem' or even the 'GOOD OF THE SPECIES.'
Any harmony or stability is only an indirect result of
individuals relentlessly pursuing their own self-interest
-- in modern parlance, getting more of their genes into
future generations by greater reproductive success.
Individuals are the unit of selection; the "struggle
for existence" is a matter among individuals (Stephen
Gould).
_With very few exceptions_, the only parts of the theory
of natural selection which have been supported by
mathematical models admit no possiblity of the
evolution of any characters which are on average to
the disadvantage of the individuals possessing them.
If natural selection followed the classical models
exclusively, species would not show any behavior more
positively social than the coming together of the
sexes and parental care....(W. D. Hamilton).
Even with qualifications regarding the possibility
of group selection, the portrait of the biologically
based social personality that emerges is one of
predominantly self-serving opportunism EVEN FOR THE
MOST SOCIAL SPECIES, for all species in which
there is genetic competition among the social co-
operators, that is, where all members have the chance
of parenthood (Donald Campbell).
Unlike [Lorentz and Montagu], I think 'nature red in
tooth and claw' sums up our modern understanding of
natural selection admirably. (Dawkins).
[END QUOTES]
Mike. How do you account for the the noble motives in
yourself given that all these authors find them incomprehensible?
Or do you simply think these guys really don't really mean any
of this, e.g., that they are diliberately overstating the case?
Do you disagree with E. O. Wilson's remark that altruism (e.g.
concern for the species as a whole) is 'the central theoretical
problem of sociobiology'?
PR
---
þ RIMEGate(tm)/RGXPost V1.14 at BBSWORLD * Info{at}bbsworld.com
---
* RIMEGate(tm)V10.2áÿ* RelayNet(tm) NNTP Gateway * MoonDog BBS
* RgateImp.MoonDog.BBS at 12/27/03 8:11:37 PM
* Origin: MoonDog BBS, Brooklyn,NY, 718 692-2498, 1:278/230 (1:278/230)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 278/230 10/345 106/1 2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.