From: "Gary Britt" 

Both you and Rich miss the point of my post entirely.  I didn't claim that
catching these guys with 1000's of cell phones was due to NSA surveillance.
I'm saying that this is clearly a sign that the NSA leaks did in fact
damage our intelligence gathering and that terrorists did in fact change
their behavior AFTER these traitorous leaks because PRIOR to these leaks we
weren't apprehending people with 1000's of cell phones.  We start
apprehending them only AFTER the leaks and would be terrorists begin to
CHANGE their behavior as a RESULT of the NSA surveillance leaks.

I'm saying this fact that NOW we catch guys with 1000's of cell phones and
BEFORE the leaks we didn't put the LIE to the liberal traitors pooh poohing
the effect of the leaks as being inconsequential.

And for Rich to paraphrase your little snark to me.  Don't let the FACTS
get in the way of defense of the traitors who leak our national security
secrets.

Gary

"Phil Payne"  wrote in
message news:44de3034{at}w3.nls.net...
>> I remember all that.   Strange that if these liberal traitors more
>> interested in political power than the safety of our children were
>> correct
>> in their assertions above, that PRIOR TO THESE LEAKS WE WEREN'T CATCHING
>> NUMEROUS AND SEPARATE GROUPS OF MUSLIM CRIMINALS WITH 1000'S OF PREPAID
> HARD > TO TRACE CELL PHONES IN THEIR VEHICLES.
>
> Trying to make some sense out of all that.
>
> The arrests, as I understand it, were prompted not by any sophisticated
> surveillance but by shop assistants (clerks) at Walmart becoming
> suspicious - their awareness having been raised by earlier reports and a
> directive from their management.
>
> The directive was apparently the result of an FBI Advisory dated 3 August.
>
> I don't see where the New York Times, the NSA, leaks, surveillance or
> anything else fits in this.  It's plain, simple, boring and very effective
> police work.
>
> http://www.nationalledger.com/artman/publish/article_27267626.shtml
>
> "During a telephone conversation between British Prime Minister Tony Blair
> and President George W. Bush regarding the terrorist plot and arrests in
> the
> United Kingdom, Blair warned Bush about possible intelligence leaks in the
> US, according to Fox News.
>
> There is fear that the ongoing investigation into a large-scale terrorist
> attack on airline flights between the UK and US will be compromised by
> leakers and the American news media, who in the past have compromised
> national security."
>
> Why do you think we didn't ****ing tell you until the arrests were
> underway?
> Your intelligence services leak like sieves.
>
> I have a friend who is involved in another issue - not directly
> terrorist-related.  He passed information to two US officials on a
> "need-to-know" and strict non-distribution basis.  And read it in the
> papers
> days later.  He (and his department) now pass _NO_ information to US
> authorities.  It just blows their operations.
>
> And note - this isn't legitimate whistle-blowing like in the NYT case -
> this
> is someone leaking a story for personal gain of some kind.  I support
> whistle-blowers, but these ****s should be shot.
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5