->     Obviously Steve you know little of law.  Eyewitness is hearsay?
Yep.
-> How is that.  Eyewitness is called 1st person.  A person in the 
-> presence of a crime is an eyewitness.  Period.  And it is usually the 
-> only type a court will accept.
  
->  Hearsay is not admissable, as in "I heard that so and so did this".
When someone tells you they saw a UFO they are doing JUST THAT! You are
just the "I" in your example.
And hearsay IS admissable, but it has to be supported by evidence.
->  You certainly have it backwards.
Nope. Eye witnesses's tend to be wrong, and sometimes even liars. The
need for PHYSICAL EVIDENCE is required. 
Thus, UFO eyewitness accounts are not proof. If they were then alien
visitations would be proven. That isn't the case. WHY? Because there is
no valid and substantiated physical evidence to support that eyewitness
testimony.
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/Wildcat5! v2.0
---------------