In article , Terry Stone
 writes
>Ted,
>   I like the way you love to attack everyone for having an opinion
>which does not fit your thought process - sort of reminds me of the
>Nazis during WWII - my way or death. Your accusations are all that keeps
>you alive at times and I know that you do have information worth sharing
>to say but have yet to learn to control yourself to make the points. You
>always have to 

TRY to

>make someone look bad or come up with an accusation to
>discredit them so as to keep you on top.

but usually fail miserably

> Your accusation in this case is
>a "shill" which I for one think is ridiculous.

for two Terry. At least!

> If you can provide I am a
>shill for someone then do so; if not then you owe me and this ng an
>apology for being such an arrogant and obnoxious person when things do
>not go your way. 

And that'll be a LONG time coming. Probably longer than the SECOND
coming. No, not probably, DEFINITELY!

>Talking of "shills" is Ronnie Ruff yours?

You worked that out too?

>   As far as surveys go it is up to the reader to decide to do this or
>not. They should be able to read what is there and decide to submit or
>not.

Absolutely.

> Lets give people on these old computers a little credit for having
>a thinking process.

Don't be a heretic. Obey the word of the Ted and don't think at all.

>   You say I am a relative newcomer to computers and to email.... Since
>I remember using ROSCOE for an email system on the mainframe back in the
>late 60 and early 70s could be mistaken on the actual start date and I
>have used email since forums started I would say our time in this is
>equal or not.

Not that is makes one iota of difference. It's as bad as saying you've
not been driving as long as me, so FUCKING WELL GIVE WAY TO ME!!!! :-)

> So when did you work with computer systems, what degrees
>do you have behind them,

He's got 360 degrees, so he just goes round in circles.

> and how long have you been using email? 
>   Also, what medical background do you have in diabetes?

He discovered that diabetes has a magnificent side effect. It removes
ANY trace of doubt that anyone other than oneself is stupid and needs
taking care of and protecting. Particularly from spammers.

> What research
>or papers have you published in this area or in information sciences?
>Where can we read these?

Ahhhh. now you've asked :-)

>
>Ted Rosenberg wrote:

A load of shite as usual, but finished off with:-
>> 
>> You are a relative newcomer here, and you are QUITE welcome to answer
>> ANY scam on the net - 

For which we must all be VERY grateful. 

>What bothers me is that in your recent posts, you
>> seem to have become a shill, for scammers, and appear to be being paid.
   ^^^^^

Very cool use of the word Ted. Leaves us wondering how sure you are.
>> 
>> Anyone who does not heed warnings not to fill out surveys for

>> unidentified sources will reap the consequences.

Which will include eyestrain by NG use, choking by spam or even death by
e-mail


Beav