-=> Quoting Ivy Iverson to Paul Andinach <=-
 II> FINAL CONCLUSION: The U.S. Govt. MUST, by applying common logic, HAS
 II> to be covering up SOMETHING!  And since the cover-up appears to be
 II> aimed at unidentified objects in the sky or on the ground, (common
 II> term: UFOs), a thinking person can ONLY conclude that the givvernment
 II> is LYING to cover up SOMETHING!
    Hi Ivy,
         Well, on a minor point, it  seems over  so many  decades there  is 
always coming to light some form of scandal.  Cover-up.  Governments always 
seem to have something  hidden.  There  was Watergate,  there was  this and 
that, history is full of it.  I would not always say "lying", in some cases 
perhaps, I would rather call it 'not divulging'.  Or rather a policy of 'we 
are mute'.  It is quite obvious.  There is  an illogical  protection policy 
around a subject that is officially  regarded as  nonsense.
        There  is  also  a  collection of  data by  parties who  profess no 
interest in the subject.  Again this is odd.  These parties have shown that 
when politely asked they admit to no data, and when  forced, suddenly  they 
have data.  Again an oddity.  To myself that  spells "policy".   The policy 
is simple, only admit to data, if absolutely necessary.  But why.  That is 
the key question, why not freely hand it out, this subject has  been termed 
a non security issue.  This UFO business is  a sham  according to  official 
position.  A skeptic may reason that intel procedures could be compromised,
that is unlikely, since intel procedures  have to  change within  a certain 
time period.  Therefore on older files, there is no danger of exposure. Yet
these files are still classified.  So it likely your analysis  is accurate.  
There is more here than meets the eye.  Not that I concur with say  Roswell 
etc, for my own reasons, but let us just say the intel organizations have
some data.........
Happy Trails,
Fred.
--- Blue Wave/DOS v2.30
---------------