From: "John D.Wentzky" 

In news:pJUOh.87767$DN.49303{at}pd7urf2no, CafeWriter
 typed:
> "John D.Wentzky" 
wrote in message
> news:8gROh.21870$nV1.1723{at}bignews6.bellsouth.net...
>> In news:XvHOh.85096$DN.84454{at}pd7urf2no,
>> CafeWriter  typed:
>>> "John D.Wentzky"
 wrote in message
>>> news:rsEOh.21630$nV1.9024{at}bignews6.bellsouth.net...
>>>> In news:460a7e0f$0$27104$db0fefd9{at}news.zen.co.uk,
>>>> Martin  typed:
>>>>> J Young wrote:
>>>>>> How dare anyone or any institution try to suppress
this young
>>>>>> man's First Amendment rights! Thank God that this
judge was such
>>>>>> a wise and insightful man; who knows how many
lives are being
>>>>>> saved by his ruling?
>>>>>
>>>>> You don't get it Young
>>>>>
>>>>> You do realise it has given the same right to every student who
>>>>> wants to hand out any political or moral leaflets? Now the whole
>>>>> place can be flooded with freedon leaflets supporting
the right of
>>>>> choice. The schools wanted this stuff kept out for a
reason, now a
>>>>> judge has
>>>>> made it a free-for-all
>>>>
>>>> If pamphlets are handed out that approve of the crime of murder in
>>>> an attempt to propagandize the students into believing that
>>>> indiscriminately killing unborn human fetuses in utero is
>>>> acceptable in any case based only upon a gender-biased,
>>>> unconstitutional right to choose, they can prosecute the offenders
>>>> who are doing nothing more than conspiring to kill the unborn.
>>>>
>>>
>>> They better come up with a lot more than just a truckload of
>>> evidence because like it or not, there are plenty of us
>>> Pro-Choicers and hey, what do YOU know about a woman's right to
>>> have children?  All you care about are fetuses, not the women
>>> carrying them. Next time, choose your fight wisely.
>>
>> Thank you for noticing that my words are intelligent, compassionate,
>> reasonable, and not designed to hid criminals or their crimes
>> against the people and humanity.
>> Since you gave me some advice, I advise you to stick to it, and start
>> becoming someone who can be trusted rather someone who is despised
>> by all persons.
>>
> For once, recognize a woman's right to choose if she wants to be a
> mother or not.

Why? I can not support an illicit unequal measure in law that disrepspects
all men and all children and all women who are not pro-choice.

> It is not carved into a stone somewhere that a woman
> must be a mother or else something bad will happen to her.

Who said it was?

[snip]

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag