From: "John D.Wentzky" 

In news:8FUOh.87764$DN.8411{at}pd7urf2no, CafeWriter
 typed:
> "John D.Wentzky" 
wrote in message
> news:ssROh.21875$nV1.17948{at}bignews6.bellsouth.net...
>> In news:SuHOh.85093$DN.81609{at}pd7urf2no,
>> CafeWriter  typed:
>>> "John D.Wentzky"
 wrote in message
>>> news:ipEOh.21628$nV1.20189{at}bignews6.bellsouth.net...
>>>> In news:1175091728.446228.99600{at}n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com,
>>>> J Young  typed:
>>>>> How dare anyone or any institution try to suppress this young
>>>>> man's First Amendment rights! Thank God that this judge was such
>>>>> a wise and insightful man; who knows how many lives are being
>>>>> saved by his ruling?
>>>>
>>>> I think the Honorable Victoria Roberts is a woman, there, JY.
>>>> A very nice decision indeed.
>>>> I am sure the public would be pleased to read this ruling in their
>>>> newspapers.
>>>> And, I am sure that any opposing viewpoints would be viewed with
>>>> much consternation and suspicion into why would anyone want to
>>>> oppose such a ruling?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I would welcome any suspicions and etc... because I do oppose her
>>> ruling.
>>> Oh why would I want to oppose such a ruling? Well because it
>>> basically takes away a woman's right to decide whatever or not to be
>>> a mother and change the status, making the fetus to be more
>>> important than women.
>>
>> It does not regard the fetus as being more important than the woman,
>> you hypocrite.
>> Your stance is what regards women as more important than other
>> members of humanity.
>> You must submit or be dominated.
>
> No, I am not going to be a mother and I am going to stick to that
> decision. Oh and to be ordered to submit to the other members of
> humanity or be dominated... no thanks.

Oops.
You mean to say you are content with pro-choice dominators telling you what to do?

> I'd rather be a single woman.
>
>>
>>> Guess what, if a fetus cannot live without a woman, what does that
>>> makes it exactly?
>>
>> Dependent and worthy of love.
>>
> Then I am so happy that I got myself fixed because I do not want
> children!!!

So, why are you against living in utero humanity if you can not get pregnant?

> Just for once get it in your tiny head that not every woman wants to
> be a mother nor go through the horrifying labour.
>
> Don't even say "labour of love" because of course, it involves blood
> loss, etc...
>
> So get over it!!!

Get over it when it is unconstitutional roevwadedom? How?

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag