From: Gary Wiltshire 

On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 00:17:21 -0600, David N. Barnett  wrote:

> On Mon, 22 Dec 2003 21:17:01 -0500, Gary Wiltshire 
> wrote in message :
>
> | Sez you.  If Bush and Powell had meant "imminent" they'd have said |
> "imminent."
>
> Define "is."
>

I didn't say anything about "is."  An attack which is
"imminent" is on the way.  A "clear and present" danger
is a potential.  The idea was to strike
*before* an attack was "imminent."  Too complex for you?

--
Gary Wiltshire

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5