JD>ability to defend themselves (not a right). He claims that this is
JD>established in common law (both English and the derivative American
JD>versions). Therefore, there is not a "right" to self defense, nor has 
here
JD>ever been one. This, to me, is chilling. If they come for me, I will
JD>exercise both my right to defend myself and my ability.
this is ca-ca.  "...Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness..." are 
the most inalienable rights.  Of course, expecting the law to observe the 
law is a rather naive idea...
þ SLMR 2.0 þ For every vision there is an equal and opposite revision.
* LAKOTA v1.5
--- Alexi/Mail 2.02 (#10000)
---------------