Steve Kemp wrote in a message to Fred Austin:
->  SK> Well, no evidence equals no basis. Even eyewitness testimony is but
->  SK> hearsay in court. The rewards of being a "victim" of an 
->  SK> abduction are many..from monetary to ego engrandizment.
->     I  beg  to  differ,  concerning  court  testimony, eyewitness  is 
-> first person testimony, hearsay is 2nd, 3rd, and usually not 
-> admissable in court.
 SK> You are wrong on so many levels. First, eyewitness testimony IS
 SK> hearsay...and it is time and again proven wrong. People
 SK> don't have good memories, and they can say one person looks like
 SK> another at a drop of a dime. Second, hearsay IS admissible...but as
 SK> such. 
It doesn't matter because it is off-topic in this echo.  Please take it 
elsewhere.
 SK> Read a book....learn to think, THEN debate me. 
I sincerely hope it is done in a LAW echo, unless you both would have an 
inclination to return to on-topic postings from this argumentative thread.
 SK> And the moderator said to stop this garbage. I did. It's your turn.
And the moderator is asking you one more time.
Regards,
Roger
Moderator - UFO Echo
Roger.Nelson@f7.n3828.z1.fidonet.org 
--- timEd/2 1.10+
---------------