->  SK> Well, no evidence equals no basis. Even eyewitness testimony is but
->  SK> hearsay in court. The rewards of being a "victim" of an 
-> abduction are  SK> many..from monetary to ego engrandizment.
->     I  beg  to  differ,  concerning  court  testimony, eyewitness  is 
-> first person testimony, hearsay is 2nd, 3rd, and usually not 
-> admissable in court.
You are wrong on so many levels. First, eyewitness testimony IS
hearsay...and it is time and again proven wrong. People
don't have good memories, and they can say one person looks like another
at a drop of a dime. Second, hearsay IS admissible...but as such.
Read a book....learn to think, THEN debate me. 
And the moderator said to stop this garbage. I did. It's your turn.
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/Wildcat5! v2.0
---------------