From: David N. Barnett 

Trim your quotebacks.

On Mon, 29 Dec 2003 15:48:41 -0500, Gary Wiltshire 
wrote in message :

| Crack a book.
|
| On Tue, 23 Dec 2003 21:05:49 -0500, Robert Comer
 | wrote:
|
| >> OK, "Presently dangerous" does NOT equal "threat
of imminent use or
| >> threat
| >> of imminent attack"  Presently dangerous doesn't imply USE.
| >
| > Spin all you like but Bush used the "real and present" danger as the
| > excuse
| > to attack Iraq.
| >
| >> Cars are presently capable of moving from one location to another.
| >> Saying
| > a
| >> car is presently capable of motion does NOT mean that the car IS
| >> currently
| >> in motion.
| >
| > Er, neither does imminent.
| >
| >> WMDs are presently dangerous does not mean WMD are in the air and on the
| > way
| >> to New York.
| >
| > Wow, same as imminent.
| >
| >> Get over it, you lost.
| >
| > Nope.
| >
| > - Bob Comer
| >
| >
| > "Gary Britt"  wrote in message
| > news:3fe8d1d2$1{at}w3.nls.net...
| >> OK, "Presently dangerous" does NOT equal "threat
of imminent use or
| >> threat
| >> of imminent attack"  Presently dangerous doesn't imply USE.
| >>
| >> Cars are presently capable of moving from one location to another.
| >> Saying
| > a
| >> car is presently capable of motion does NOT mean that the car IS
| >> currently
| >> in motion.
| >>
| >> WMDs are presently dangerous does not mean WMD are in the air and on the
| > way
| >> to New York.
| >>
| >> Get over it, you lost.
| >>
| >> Cheers,
| >>
| >> Gary
| >>
| >>
| >> "Robert Comer"  wrote in message
| >> news:3fe7953c$1{at}w3.nls.net...
| >> > YES I DID.
| >> >
| >> > >That quote was "real and present danger"
which does NOT use
| >> > > the word IMMINENT and does NOT mean IMMINENT.
| >> >
| >> > REAL AND PRESENT MEANS *****NOW****** as in any time, as in imminent.
| >> >
| >> > - Bob Comer
| >> >
| >> >
| >> > "Gary Britt" 
wrote in message
| >> > news:3fe789a4{at}w3.nls.net...
| >> > > NO YOU DIDN'T.  That quote was "real and present
danger" which does
| > NOT
| >> > use
| >> > > the word IMMINENT and does NOT mean IMMINENT.
| >> > >
| >> > > Cheers,
| >> > >
| >> > > Gary
| >> > >
| >> > > "Robert Comer"
 wrote in message
| >> > > news:3fe7553e$1{at}w3.nls.net...
| >> > > > I posted a quote from Colin Powel that said just
that in his
| >> speech
| > to
| >> > the
| >> > > > U.N...
| >> > > >
| >> > > > - Bob Comer
| >> > > >
| >> > > >
| >> > > > "Gary Wiltshire" 
wrote in message
| >> > > > news:opr0lm34eq8gsp74{at}news.barkto.com...
| >> > > > > On Mon, 22 Dec 2003 12:16:50 -0600, Gene McAloon
| >> > > 
| >> > > > > wrote:
| >> > > > >
| >> > > > > > On Mon, 22 Dec 2003 00:51:32 -0500,
"Mark Hessey"
| >> > > > > > 
| >> > > > > > wrote:
| >> > > > > >
| >> > > > > >> "Gene McAloon"
 wrote: It is all
| > there,
| >> > > > > >> including
| >> > > > > >> the fiction that Iraq had to be
seen as an imminent threat to
| > US
| >> > > > > >> national
| >> > > > > >> security.
| >> > > > > >>
| >> > > > > >> Well we know that part was a
fiction, as Bush never said they
| >> were
| >> > an
| >> > > > > >> "imminent threat."
| >> > > > > >>
| >> > > > > >
| >> > > > > > He did, of course.
| >> > > > >
| >> > > > > No he did not, of course.  Give us a quote,
Gene and not
| >> > GeneFacts(TM).
| >> > > > >
| >> > > > > And that notwithstanding your attempts to prove
| >> > > > > > otherwise by
| >> > > > > > citing this of that isolated speech in
which he didn't happen
| >> to
| >> > > mention
| >> > > > > > it that
| >> > > > > > particular time.
| >> > > > > >
| >> > > > > > Hang it up, Mark. Your feeble attempts
to mislead, spin, bob
| >> and
| >> > weave
| >> > > > > > are
| >> > > > > > getting you nowhere.
| >> > > > > >
| >> > > > > >
| >> > > > >
| >> > > > >
| >> > > > >
| >> > > > > -- > > > > Gary Wiltshire
| >> > > >
| >> > > >
| >> > >
| >> > >
| >> >
| >> >
| >>
| >>
| >
| >
| >

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5