TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: alt_dos
to: Leonard Erickson
from: Robert Bull
date: 2003-06-08 16:29:16
subject: Win9x and Arachne ?

Hello, Leonard;

02 Jun 03 18:27, Leonard Erickson wrote to Robert Bull:

 LE> Take command (and 4NT) are running console sessions, so they are still
 LE> subject to the limits placed by the OS. And rightfully so.

 LE> Basically, Windows NT/2k/XP (and OS/2) are not using "strong-arm
 LE> tactics". They are acting *properly* to prevent programs on a
 LE> multitasking system from trashing other tasks.

 LE> Windows 1.x/2.x/3.x/95/98/ME are *broken* because they *don't*
 LE> restrict programs to the alloted RAM and HW access.

 LE> Direct hardware access and multitasking don't mix at all well.

Hmmm, OK.  Starting from scratch, I will probably have to move from 95/98 
to XP at work.  When I do, I still want to be able to take Procomm Plus 
along.  That's partly because it's rock-solid reliable and I don't want to 
change anything, or even recompile scripts for the Windows version of 
Procomm if I can help it.  The other part is that I simply don't like the 
look and feel of GUIs and much prefer a console-mode interface because I 
find the screens much easier and clearer to read.

So, do I take it that Take Command will allow a DOS terminal program to run 
as expected, while still behaving correctly under Windows?

     Thanks in anticipation,

              Robert.

--- GoldED 3.00.Beta2+
* Origin: The Luminous Void (2:250/501.4)
SEEN-BY: 633/267 270
@PATH: 250/501 140/1 106/2000 633/267

SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.