| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Win9x and Arachne ? |
Hello, Leonard;
02 Jun 03 18:27, Leonard Erickson wrote to Robert Bull:
LE> Take command (and 4NT) are running console sessions, so they are still
LE> subject to the limits placed by the OS. And rightfully so.
LE> Basically, Windows NT/2k/XP (and OS/2) are not using "strong-arm
LE> tactics". They are acting *properly* to prevent programs on a
LE> multitasking system from trashing other tasks.
LE> Windows 1.x/2.x/3.x/95/98/ME are *broken* because they *don't*
LE> restrict programs to the alloted RAM and HW access.
LE> Direct hardware access and multitasking don't mix at all well.
Hmmm, OK. Starting from scratch, I will probably have to move from 95/98
to XP at work. When I do, I still want to be able to take Procomm Plus
along. That's partly because it's rock-solid reliable and I don't want to
change anything, or even recompile scripts for the Windows version of
Procomm if I can help it. The other part is that I simply don't like the
look and feel of GUIs and much prefer a console-mode interface because I
find the screens much easier and clearer to read.
So, do I take it that Take Command will allow a DOS terminal program to run
as expected, while still behaving correctly under Windows?
Thanks in anticipation,
Robert.
--- GoldED 3.00.Beta2+
* Origin: The Luminous Void (2:250/501.4)SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 250/501 140/1 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.