From: "Gary Britt" 

Her injunction order is also a blatant violation of her authority and the
separation of powers between the judiciary and the executive.  Imagine a
federal judge trying to order the commander in chief what battlefield
intelligence he can gather and what he can't at a time of war.  A more
clear cut abuse of power and authority and a more clear violation of the
separation of powers in our constitution could not be produced.  I don't
expect any federal judge to acknowledge this abuse of power and limit on
their authority.  Their lifetime appointments make them think they have no
limits.  I do expect the decision to be overturned rather quickly on
appeal, but I'm foolish enough to think this is the end of Judicial
meddling where they have no constitutional authority whatsoever.

Gary

"Mark"  wrote in message
news:44e60629{at}w3.nls.net...
>
> "Rich Gauszka"  wrote in message
> news:44e4cd04$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> Hey a little thing like violating the constitution  never stopped the
>> Bushies before. Hopefully the ruling will survive appeal
>
> No chance that mish mosh of partisanship will pass muster on appeal. She
> comes across like a flake:
>
> http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110008816
> "So we suppose a kind of congratulations are due to federal Judge Anna
> Diggs Taylor, who won her 10 minutes of fame yesterday for declaring that
> President Bush had taken upon himself "the inherent power to violate not
> only the laws of the Congress but the First and Fourth Amendments of the
> Constitution, itself." Oh, and by the way, the Jimmy Carter appointee also
> avers that "there are no hereditary Kings in America." In
case you hadn't
> heard. ... early in the decision, Judge Taylor refers with apparent
> derision to "the war on terror of this Administration.""
>
> and here:
>
> http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=OWVlOGNiZmIyMmZkYTg2OGFiYzM3ZGU4Nzc0MjFj
NzQ=
>
> "Much will be said about this opinion in the coming days. I'll start with
> this: I wouldn't accept this utterly unsupported, constitutionally and
> logically bankrupt collection of musings from a first-year law student,
> much less a new lawyer at my firm. Why not? Herewith, a start at a very
> long list of what's wrong with Judge Taylor's opinion."
>
>
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5