From: "Robert G Lewis" 


"Robert Comer"  wrote in message
news:44e62eee{at}w3.nls.net...
> >I already provided critiques of her decision earlier in the thread Bob,
>
> And they didn't jive with the document to me...
>
>> there are lots more (including the WaPo) but what's the point of arguing
>> about it?
>
> You post here it's fair game for argument. 
>
>>I believe it should be overturned, you believe it shouldn't
>
> Yep, I just can't past first amendment rights on this one. (more than one,
> search and seizure, free speech, ...)  And you think the president has the
> power to do whatever he feels like in the name of fighting terror when it
> comes to dealing with everyone (even U.S. citizens.)
>
> Anyway, it's a very deep argument that needs to be healed -- we aren't the
> only two arguing either side and there is no middle ground for anyone.
> It's ripping our society apart and it's only going to get worse for the
> next 2 years.
>
>>I don't like the idea of a bunch of liberals trying to blind us, cut off
>>our hands, and muffle our ears.
>
> And I don't like a bunch of so called conservatives giving away everyone's
> rights. (I'll no longer call republican's conservatives, they left that a
> LONG time ago)
>
>>I see no reason why I should die because they are paranoid that the
>>government might find out they like Jif over Skippy.
>
> And I see no reason to give away my rights so you can feel warm fuzzies
> about faux protection from the crazies.
>
> All that said, I'm sorry for the tone of my posts today, I've got one heck
> of a migraine headache so my inhibitions are suffering...
>
> --
> Bob Comer


Shoot these are some of your BEST posts 


I do really like the phase
"warm fuzzies  about faux protection from the crazies."

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5