From: "John D.Wentzky" 

In news:szkmz1vlpoh.fsf{at}eris.io.com, The Chief Instigator
 typed:
> "John D.Wentzky"  writes:
>
>> In news:szkps6ru667.fsf{at}eris.io.com,
>> The Chief Instigator  typed:
>>> "John D.Wentzky"
 writes:
>
>>>> In news:460b3d71$0$14136$742ec2ed{at}news.sonic.net,
>>>> Ray Fischer  typed:
>>>>> J Young  wrote:
>
>>>>>> How dare anyone or any institution try to suppress
this young
>>>>>> man's First Amendment rights!
>
>>>>> You're pro-censorship.  You don't believe in free speech.
>
>>>> I believe in Freedom of SPeech.
>
>>> You claim to, but your subsequent statements contradict your own
>>> proclamation.
>
>>>> Why don't you?
>>>> Satellite and cable television are currently in violation of
>>>> Freedom of Speech.
>
>>> Prove it.
>
>>>> Why is it the EU has free satellite television and free satellite
>>>> radio? Why does canada have free digital radio?
>>>> Huh?
>
>>> Guess what, Sherlock...we have free digital radio in this country.
>>> There are a number of Houston stations that broadcast on a digital
>>> subchannel.
>
>> Cool.  Free market economics at work.
>
> Maybe you should shut up and actually learn, for once.

I knew about Ibiquity years ago.

>>>> We are waiting for your answer.
>
>>> No one gives a flying fuck at a rolling doughnut what the voices in
>>> your head tell you.
>
>> You anti-liberty loons don't seem to care much about constitutional
>> government.
>
> More so than you've demonstrated (or are ever likely to demonstrate).

You gotta be kidding.

>>>> The people of the USA are sick of you ungenerous criminals stealing
>>>> their money illegally.
>
>>> The people of the USA will likely be a little safer, after the end
>>> of your trial.
>
>> You mean the people will be safer if someone who isn't a threat to
>> anyone in this society, me, is wrongfully incarcerated or
>> sequestered to a mental health facility?
>
> You mean "rightly", since you're certifiable, given your spew of the
> last few days.

Certifiably sane.

>  No sane person would make some of the claims you have.

What claims?
Why is it you can not understand the law and how it is a tool to adjudicate
issues rather than acting as if everyone who actually does understand the
law is somehow insane?

>> Anti-liberty loon imaginations are what get you into such binds.
>
> You're the anti-liberty loon, indeed,

Not even close.


> and I'll ask you again to quit
> talking to yourself in a public newsgroup.

Hi, Patrick.

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag