From: "John D.Wentzky" 

In news:szkhcs3u5su.fsf{at}eris.io.com, The Chief Instigator
 typed:
> "John D.Wentzky"  writes:
>
>> In news:8FUOh.87764$DN.8411{at}pd7urf2no,
>> CafeWriter  typed:
>>> "John D.Wentzky"
 wrote in message
>>> news:ssROh.21875$nV1.17948{at}bignews6.bellsouth.net...
>>>> In news:SuHOh.85093$DN.81609{at}pd7urf2no,
>>>> CafeWriter  typed:
>>>>> "John D.Wentzky"
 wrote in message
>>>>> news:ipEOh.21628$nV1.20189{at}bignews6.bellsouth.net...
>>>>>> In
news:1175091728.446228.99600{at}n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com,
>>>>>> J Young  typed:
>>>>>>> How dare anyone or any institution try to
suppress this young
>>>>>>> man's First Amendment rights! Thank God that
this judge was such
>>>>>>> a wise and insightful man; who knows how many
lives are being
>>>>>>> saved by his ruling?
>
>>>>>> I think the Honorable Victoria Roberts is a woman,
there, JY.
>>>>>> A very nice decision indeed.
>>>>>> I am sure the public would be pleased to read this ruling in
>>>>>> their newspapers.
>>>>>> And, I am sure that any opposing viewpoints would
be viewed with
>>>>>> much consternation and suspicion into why would
anyone want to
>>>>>> oppose such a ruling?
>
>>>>> I would welcome any suspicions and etc... because I do
oppose her
>>>>> ruling.
>>>>> Oh why would I want to oppose such a ruling? Well because it
>>>>> basically takes away a woman's right to decide
whatever or not to
>>>>> be a mother and change the status, making the fetus to be more
>>>>> important than women.
>
>>>> It does not regard the fetus as being more important than the
>>>> woman, you hypocrite.
>>>> Your stance is what regards women as more important than other
>>>> members of humanity.
>>>> You must submit or be dominated.
>
>>> No, I am not going to be a mother and I am going to stick to that
>>> decision. Oh and to be ordered to submit to the other members of
>>> humanity or be dominated... no thanks.
>
>> Oops.
>> You mean to say you are content with pro-choice dominators telling
>> you what to do?
>
> No, she's content to choose to be a mother when *she* wants to be.
> You don't get any input into her decision, and neither do I - but
> then, I know better than to interfere in something that isn't anyone
> else's business (except for those she chooses to include in her
> decision, which you most assuredly won't be).
>
>>> I'd rather be a single woman.
>
>>>>> Guess what, if a fetus cannot live without a woman,
what does that
>>>>> makes it exactly?
>
>>>> Dependent and worthy of love.
>
>>> Then I am so happy that I got myself fixed because I do not want
>>> children!!!
>
>> So, why are you against living in utero humanity if you can not get
>> pregnant?
>
> Why are you a babbling maniac who's likely going to get to do some
> time in prison?

Likely to you is almost a guaranteed impossibility. All you criminal
anti-liberty self-protection freaks are loading up for disaster.

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag