From: doug.bryce{at}sympatico.ca (Doug Bryce)

Well, I just searched using  (canadian "trading with the enemy")
- no brackets, of course  and got this:     (and this is the
incident
that I was recalling)

http://www.google.com/search?q=canadian+%22trading+with+the+enemy%22&hl=en&lr=&
ie=UTF-8&safe=off&start=10&sa=N

On reading one or two of the presented links, I see it suggested that he
was operating a sales office rather than being employed by a Canadian
subsidiary.   And I don't recall seeing those stories the
last time that I looked - albeit a year or more ago.   Can't remember
the outcome of all of this though :-((

Doug

On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 19:26:28 -0500, "John Beamish"
 wrote:

>Good memory!  Yeah, I think you've got it.
>
>"Doug Bryce"  wrote in message
>news:3ff3639d.25277558{at}news.barkto.com...
>> I'm not sure of all the details, either, but it sounds a lot like the
>> case of a Canadian (employed under identical circumstances) who was
>> then tranferred to the US parent company and (this is where I'm a
>> little fuzzy) the parent company was trading with Cuba through the
>> Canadian subsidiary.  I thiink he was 'responsible' for this activity
>> and he and the company were both charged under the 'Trading with the
>> enemy act'.  But....he was also charged - and convicted - for stuff
>> related to his activities in Canada while working for the Canadian
>> subsidiary.
>>
>> (I'll try and 'google' it again and find some links)
>>
>> Doug
>>
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5