From: doug.bryce{at}sympatico.ca (Doug Bryce)

I didn't read all of the links this time , but I do remember
finding some 'interesting' articles when I was looking for more info at the
time the conviction was reported.



On Thu, 1 Jan 2004 20:03:55 -0500, "John Beamish"
 wrote:

>Yeah, that's the one.  I followed one of the links within the links to the
>PBS transcript.  The ignorance is breathtaking.
>
>REP. ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, (R) Florida: (Capitol Hill) Well, I think that
>Canada should be left out of it. They are free to trade with Cuba. They're
>free to trade with any country that they want to. All that the Helms-Burton
>Bill does is protect confiscated American property. If Canada wants to build
>a four-star hotel on one of the beautiful beaches of Cuba--beaches, by the
>way, which Cuban citizens cannot use,hotels which Cuban natives cannot go
>into--but if Canada wants to do it, they are welcome to do it.
>
>
>
>
>"Doug Bryce"  wrote in message
>news:3ff4b075.62573559{at}news.barkto.com...
>> Well, I just searched using  (canadian "trading with the
enemy") - no
>> brackets, of course  and got this:     (and this is the incident
>> that I was recalling)
>>
>>
>http://www.google.com/search?q=canadian+%22trading+with+the+enemy%22&hl=en&lr=
&ie=UTF-8&safe=off&start=10&sa=N
>>
>> On reading one or two of the presented links, I see it suggested that
>> he was operating a sales office rather than being employed by a
>> Canadian subsidiary.   And I don't recall seeing those stories the
>> last time that I looked - albeit a year or more ago.   Can't remember
>> the outcome of all of this though :-((
>>
>> Doug
>>
>> On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 19:26:28 -0500, "John Beamish"
>>  wrote:
>>
>> >Good memory!  Yeah, I think you've got it.
>> >
>> >"Doug Bryce"  wrote in message
>> >news:3ff3639d.25277558{at}news.barkto.com...
>> >> I'm not sure of all the details, either, but it sounds a
lot like the
>> >> case of a Canadian (employed under identical circumstances) who was
>> >> then tranferred to the US parent company and (this is where I'm a
>> >> little fuzzy) the parent company was trading with Cuba through the
>> >> Canadian subsidiary.  I thiink he was 'responsible' for
this activity
>> >> and he and the company were both charged under the
'Trading with the
>> >> enemy act'.  But....he was also charged - and convicted - for stuff
>> >> related to his activities in Canada while working for the Canadian
>> >> subsidiary.
>> >>
>> >> (I'll try and 'google' it again and find some links)
>> >>
>> >> Doug
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5