PE>> Hi guys.  I am sending both of you PQWK218.  There seems to
 PE>> be a problem with messages greater than 32k, which may or
 PE>> may not be causing your problem.  I recompiled under
 PE>> Borland instead of Watcom and the problem went away, so I
 PE>> didn't bother investigating.

 BV> That's what I like to see.
 BV> Real programming techniques being properly applied :)

I was bloody tired, and I wasn't going to be jacked around
by not being able to use Turbo Debugger, so I figured that
Watcom could stick it where it fits.  Of course, I don't
suspect the compiler to be at fault, but there are only two
things worse than vomiting, and one of them is looking at
Mark Kimes's code.

 BV> It's not really that big a problem. On the RARE occasion that it
 BV> does blow up (your BIG message was the only one recently) I can
 BV> always undelete the original file and I then process each PKT
 BV> separately. In this instance I just scanned your PKT and then
 BV> trashed it. In future, I will send you a ZIP (renamed) containing
 BV> any faulty PKT files.

You can put the PKTs into a ZIP file, so long as the extension
is ZIP, not MO0 et al.  And so long as they are in a ZIP file,
not PKT.  PKT and MO0, TU0 etc are all treated as mail and will
be automatically processed.  BFN.  Paul.
@EOT:

--- Mksmsg