From: "John D.Wentzky" 

In news:SuHOh.85093$DN.81609{at}pd7urf2no, CafeWriter
 typed:
> "John D.Wentzky" 
wrote in message
> news:ipEOh.21628$nV1.20189{at}bignews6.bellsouth.net...
>> In news:1175091728.446228.99600{at}n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com,
>> J Young  typed:
>>> How dare anyone or any institution try to suppress this young man's
>>> First Amendment rights! Thank God that this judge was such a wise
>>> and insightful man; who knows how many lives are being saved by his
>>> ruling?
>>
>> I think the Honorable Victoria Roberts is a woman, there, JY.
>> A very nice decision indeed.
>> I am sure the public would be pleased to read this ruling in their
>> newspapers.
>> And, I am sure that any opposing viewpoints would be viewed with much
>> consternation and suspicion into why would anyone want to oppose
>> such a ruling?
>>
>>
> I would welcome any suspicions and etc... because I do oppose her
> ruling.
> Oh why would I want to oppose such a ruling? Well because it
> basically takes away a woman's right to decide whatever or not to be
> a mother and change the status, making the fetus to be more important
> than women.

It does not regard the fetus as being more important than the woman, you hypocrite.
Your stance is what regards women as more important than other members of humanity.
You must submit or be dominated.

> Guess what, if a fetus cannot live without a woman, what does that
> makes it exactly?

Dependent and worthy of love.

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag