From: "David Blair" 

Agreed. It should be much higher. It shows the progress made since WW II
when we held a large number of Japanese Americans just because of their
heritage, as opposed to having reason to suspect them of crimes.

By the way... you should become familiar with the concept of "checks
and balances." You may then grasp why Congress can make such
refulations over judges, just as the manner in which the other branches
exert control over each other.

Then again, I've become familiar with your baseless rants and generally
dismiss them out of hand. I doubt you'll grasp much of anything, other than
an abiding hatred of the U.S.

"Phil Payne"  wrote in message
news:3FF52428.9C2D051B{at}isham-research.com...
> Who would have thought five years ago that the USA would hold 660 people
> without trial or access to legal representation?

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5