RW> Would be really cool to see Ezy have that feature added in
 SG> as so many
 RW> networks these days are mainly QWK based (and mostly running
 SG> Synchronet it
 RW> seems).

 SG> I don't understand the need for it though... doesn't the current
 SG> FTN
 SG> method work sufficiently enough for us? After all, it is just
 SG> another
 SG> way to transport the mail from one BBS to another, isn't it?

 SG> I will see what can be done about it though.

Thanks for looking into that.  I agree about the FTN method.  Some folks
these days just don't want to be bothered with setting up a mail
tosser/scanner, etc.  Personally, I don't mind it.  I'm fine with using
Synchronet as my QWK  FTN gateway for now, but thought having
something "native" to Ezy would be a little bit, well,
"Ezy-er" :)  (Heh, bad bad bad joke, I realize that.)

--- Ezycom V2.00 01FA0268