| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | UARTs |
Hello, Charles JH> Hello, Charles. Thanks for your response as we were trying JH> to help Wayne C. by giving our best advice. CA> As was I. ?? The 'we' and 'our' above was meant to include you. CA> --8<--cut JH>> In any event, if what the Pentium board has is only 8250 JH>> or compatible/emulated, I think no need to hurry to buy an JH>> external 56K serial modem, as TBOMK the 8250 won't support JH>> that speed. Corrections welcomed, if I'm wrong. Was this the "bait" you thought you saw cast upon the waters? CA>> Seems like 'baiting' here to me but ... JH> You? Baiting? Noooooooooooo! CA> Reverse that. Someone trying to bait me. ;-) Yeah. That's the ticket - - although it appeared I was just trying to give Wayne C. some advice, I actually had found some bait, fixed up my tackle, paid out the line, and went to trolling, hoping to get into some sort of extended discussion with you. Pretty soon, the call that every troller loves to hear - - "Fish on the line!" NOT! (AAMOF, nothing could be farther from the truth). CA>> AFAIK the 8250, 16450, and 16550 (no 'A') are more or less CA>> the same in terms of performance. MSD.EXE from Wayne's W31 CA>> OS should tell him what they are? I've tested both the CA>> 8250 and 16450 and they will support 57600 using a null CA>> modem cable between the serial ports and GSZ as the CA>> application software doing the transfers with zero resends. JH> Well, a direct connection via null modem cable is one JH> thing, but as you say - - CA> The 'connect' to an external modem is no more, no less a cable CA> than the null modem cable. Once connected the modem handles the CA> 'traffic' from that point outward. No news there, and I wasn't thinking the cable would be a bottleneck. JH> Unclear to me- are you saying that my advice to Wayne that JH> 8250 UART chip won't support 56K external modem (knowing he JH> intends to use Windows and/or Linux and surf the web) JH> wasn't good advice, and you think the 56K external modem JH> would work OK for him in that application? CA> Yes, I'm saying it will work. I'll say more about that later, in the other msg response. I've no more time here for Fidonet tonight. CA> May as well thrash it out for the lurkers. I'd guess maybe by now this highly topical discussion about the 8250's with 56K external modem is playing to an audience of about two - -the moderator and Roy. - - - JimH. ... Roadkill?! Heck, Jim, lets go back- that critter is still _alive_ -Bubba --- MultiMail/MS-DOS v0.32* Origin: Try Our Web Based QWK: DOCSPLACE.ORG (1:123/140) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 123/140 500 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.