DD>RS> I was under the misapprehension that (as the term is usually
DD>RS> used in a disparaging way) you were actually suggesting how
DD>RS>  (he of the original post) should/not spend his
money. But you
DD>RS> wouldn't be doing that now, David, would you?

DD>I would be suggesting what he do with the money that the government gives hi
DD>to live on, on my behalf as a taxpayer though.

DD>David

Are you for real David? Or have you NEVER been UNEMPLOYED?
Get your head out of the sand and LOOK at the REAL WORLD!
You would be better spending your efforts to curb those who ILLEGALLY
obtain benifits, rather than those who have a legit reason.

 þ OLX 2.1 TD þ --T-A+G-L-I+N-E--+M-E-A+S-U-R+I-N-G+--G-A+U-G-E--

-+- OLMS 2.53 UNREG
--- FMail/386 1.02