From: "Judy F." 



George Sherwood wrote:



> lie n.
>    1. A false statement deliberately presented as being true; a falsehood.
>    2. Something meant to deceive or give a wrong impression.
>
> You have no proof of this.  Being wrong is not a lie.  If it turns out the
> intelligence was incorrect, this is something to be investigated and
> understood.  As many times as you might hear Howard Dean or what ever
> candidate you follow say it, it doesn't make it true.

There is and never was any WMD.  O'Neil has confirmed this. The UN had
confirmed this.  US intelligence has confirmed this.   We invaded Iraq
based on a lie and for fraudulent reasons.  That's a fact.  Please don't
try and put some sort of spin that the intelligence was incorrect. Bush
wanted to invade Iraq from nearly day one.  I'm not denying that Saddam was
a thug (among other things).  But we didn't invade Iraq for that reason/

As to Howard Dean, I have not followed his campaign at all.  I find the
whole US political scene so dismal that I'm ignoring it.  Maybe not a smart
move, but until there's a real possibility for VIABLE third party
candidates, I can't get excited.

Judy

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5