Bo

16 Feb 03 13:12, Bo Simonsen wrote to Charles Angelich:

 CA>> Seriously, does 'implemented' in the compiler seem so very
 CA>> different than 'supported' in the kernel?  Supported,
 CA>> implemented, but with no software applications that use it
 CA>> is 100% useless IMO.

 BS> Isn't the operating systems's task to use the both cpu's (or more) 
 BS> right? 

Maybe Charles is confused with the Microsoft model where the applications
bypass the OS and interact directly with the hardware....

Regards,
David

--- Msged/LNX TE 06 (pre)