AR> RT> I never implied that the lady wasn't burned.... just that
  > RT> her burns could not have been debilitating and certainly not
  > RT> to a degree as to justify hospitalization....  BTW, _was_
  > RT> she admitted???  I don't know.
AR>Ok, I see.
  >All you have about the case is "hearsay".
  >You have not looked into it any further than what has been discussed here
  >is what it looks like to me.
And it looks to me like you are trying to be condescending and
judgmental.
Since you were AT the trial (otherwise all YOU have is "hearsay")...
Oh well...  'nuf said on this thread...  I believe the moderator has
spoken about coffee and such anyhow....
Bye now.
---
 * QMPro 1.02 42-7029 * I love defenseless animals, especially in gravy
--- WILDMAIL!/WC v4.12 
1:135/5.0)
---------------