JS> Here are the court's findings  - since Maricopa County of Arizona was
 JS> already using the NRT as a basis of teaching and testing for EMT/EMT-P
 JS> replacing the Morton Test Bank, which exceeded the plaintiff's own
 JS> state EMT/EMT-P tests, 1) the EMT/EMT-P's that treated the couple
 JS> indeed
 JS> followed the new NR and AHA standards, 2) which was higher than
 JS> Arizona state protocol, 3) higher than what the EMT/EMT-P's were
 JS> licensed for,
 JS> 4) higher than the plaintiff's state levels of care, and 5) they were
 JS> found not guilty of substandard care even though they were not NR
 JS> certified.
But, you keep comparing the arizona situation, where the level of training
and testing was either at, or below, NR standards.
TN, being HIGHER than national standards, is clearly a different situation.
Maybe all the states that use NR standards should drop NR, and MOVE UP to
TN standards!
Heck, to follow your court case, those EMT/EMT-P's would have been guilty
if the couple had been from TN!
... 
--- PPoint 1.98
---------------