From: "Judy F." 



Mark Hessey wrote:

> Forgive me, but as I watch 60 Minutes I don't find this character very
> credible - but I do find it odd that he was appointed by Bush in the first
> place. Obviously a misjudgement.

He's not credible because he criticized Bush?  So anyone who criticizes
Bush is not credible?  I don't know.  But he was obviously in high-level
meetings, he has nothing to gain from criticizing Bush and others have said
that Bush is a disengaged president leaving the decision=making to others. 
When you start getting a chorus of voices than I think the
"accusation" deserves some study, or even merit.

  Obviously, I haven't read the book, just the newspaper excerpts, so I
don't have context etc.

judy

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5