Lennart Kiil  wrote:

> LK:-
> Recently there has been a lot of talk at SBE on publishing.
> Partly in response to this I have tried to build some features into my 
> site, which allows for publishing.
>snip for bervity<
> Standard
> Allows Authors to submit a publication. It then requires an Editor to 
> approve it.
> Enterprise
> Adds an additional approval step to the Standard workflow. An Author 
> submits. An Editor accepts or rejects. A Moderator approves or rejects. 
> A Moderator can also take publications offline and then put them back 
> online.
> Wiki
> This workflow gives Authors full access to the publications. Every time 
> someone updates a publication, a new version is built and a notification 
> email is sent. All changes to all publications are logged. Every 
> document is pre-approved.
> The use of Wiki for the name refers to the "edit-by-all" and revision 
> control features.
> MyWiki
> This workflow gives Authors full access to their own publications only. 
> Every time someone updates a publication, a new version is built. All 
> changes to all publications are logged. Every document is pre-approved. 
> No reason to mail someone since it is assumed that you edit your own 
> pages only.
> It is also possible to create a custom workflow if none of these 
> standard ones will suffice. I would like to hear from Others here what 
> kind of workflow would be usefull.

JE:-
It appears to me that LK's site for 
electronic publishing does no have 
a transparent and democratic peer
review process. I will only support
a peer review process that can be proven
to be entirely transparent and fully 
democratic.


Regards,

John Edser
Independent Researcher

PO Box 266
Church Pt
NSW 2105
Australia

edser{at}tpg.com.au




>
---
þ RIMEGate(tm)/RGXPost V1.14 at BBSWORLD * Info{at}bbsworld.com

---
 * RIMEGate(tm)V10.2áÿ* RelayNet(tm) NNTP Gateway * MoonDog BBS
 * RgateImp.MoonDog.BBS at 11/16/04 6:43:05 AM