DB> To prevent the execution of a mistakenly convicted victim. If the
DB> convict has a long record of prior assaults, it would not bother me if
DB> he was in fact, somewhat less culpable; a thug is a thug, so execute
DB> him.
DB> For crimes of passion, I would prefer to send them to converted
DB> x-military bases, sterilized, and allowed private quarters; allow them
DB> to get on-base jobs, and monitor them so that they cannot be emotionally
DB> involved again.
DB> Send sex perverts there for life; in no case would any minors be allowed
DB> on a base. In both passion and pervert, we usually see a model
DB> prisoner, and in both cases, they make good workers; they'd be able to
DB> work and pay taxes, and be a minimal drag on taxpayers.
Not bad thinking at all on this subject. Why cannot our lawmakers spend a
little time discussing serious approaches to the realities of the situation?
Actually, I wonder if it ever occurs to them!!
Sincerely,
Frank
--- PPoint 2.05
---------------
* Origin: Maybe in 5,000 years - frankmas@juno.com (1:396/45.12)
|