From: "Mark" 


"Antti Kurenniemi"  wrote in
message news:44f982c9{at}w3.nls.net...
> "Mark"  wrote in message
news:44f7b2d5$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>> That's an insulting, and purposely ignorant at best, retort, Antti.
>
> Right. Tell me that 9/11 was no biggie 'cause people die anyway, and I'll
> withdraw my comment.

It was a biggie. So keep your comment.


>> There will be another set of "different deaths" coming
up soon, once the
>> feckless UN security council approves Iranian nuclear weapons by default.
>> Should we wait to see who Iran decides should die, or should we kill them
>> first?
>
> "Their" lives being less important than someone elses?

No, not in the least. All life is important to most of us, but less
important to the Islamo-Fascists.

> Let's just kill everyone and be done with it, eh? Let's just kill everyone
> and everything, because "they" maybe could possibly one day
do something
> we don't like.

You're then advocating that we sit back with our thumbs up our asses and
watch them create nuclear weapons. What we're trying to do is present a
united front against that eventuality, but the Russians and Chinese don't
seem to be interested -- so talk to them about causing death, because
that's exactly what their obfuscation is going to do. It ain't Bush's
fault, as convenient as that excuse is for the world to fall back on to
avoid scrutiny of their own fecklessness.

> a brilliant solution - I'm sure the terrorist groups would welcome you as
> a friend to their ranks for thinking exactly like they do. Is it really so
> difficult to come up with another idea besides "kill them"?

If the world isn't willing to reel them in, and now, then your solution is
to let them kill us first? No thanks.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5