From: Adam <""4thwormcastfromthemolehill\"{at}the field.near
the bridge">

George Sherwood wrote:
> On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 10:05:39 +0100, Adam wrote:
>
>> Robert Comer wrote:
>>>> There ain't that much, it's more a feeling that Americans
in  general are
>>>> somewhat "challenged".
>>> Sorry for this, but that's funny.  The ever so superior
British forget how
>>> their government has played the lap dog to those daft
"challenged"
>>> Americans.
>>>
>> No they don't which is why Blair is finished.
>
> Finished in about a year.  How close will he be to Thatcher's record for a
> PM?
>

No fixed terms in the UK. The concept of a "lame duck prime
minister" is distinctly novel & not sure to last.

>>> There's only one thing worse than doing something stupid and that's
>>> following/supporting someone else doing something stupid.
>>>
>> Indeed which is why Blair is history & the labour party is going into
>> meltdown.
>
> And how far will this June/July 2007 exit by Blair be from the plan all
> along? I don't get all the finished talk.
>

No lame duck PM'es. What's the point? No fixed terms. Complete loss of a
year for the country. Won't be popular.

Adam

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5