From: "Mark" 

That's an insulting, and purposely ignorant at best, retort, Antti. The
"different" deaths include Americans as well as Shia, Sunni et.
al.

There will be another set of "different deaths" coming up soon,
once the feckless UN security council approves Iranian nuclear weapons by
default. Should we wait to see who Iran decides should die, or should we
kill them first?

Or should we all just emulate the Eloi and march into the Morlock caves on
demand? After all, a few lives lost on schedule are a small price to pay to
enjoy pleasant afternoons of idiocy on the riverbank, yes?


"Antti Kurenniemi"  wrote in
message news:44f7ad0d{at}w3.nls.net...
> "Mark"  wrote in message
news:44f5194e{at}w3.nls.net...
>>>>>just that the area is quite volatile and Bush
Administration policies
>>>>>have added fuel to the fire.
>>>>
>>>> Yes it is, and yes his policies have. 
>>>
>>> How is it not a bad thing if innocent people are being blown up as a
>>> result?
>>
>> It could end up being a bad thing, Antti, if there is no support for, and
>> embracement of, a change in the status quo. > being spewed forth 24/7 by the MSM is that all is lost and we, the Iraqis
>> and the rest of the region are doomed to hellfire for another 60 years --
>> but, hell the MSM can barely report a local potato sack race accurately
>> and we're supposed to believe their rambling from a hotel balcony in
>> Baghdad?>
>>
>> But I don't believe, even if the effort fails (and pray that it doesn't)
>> that any additional lives will have been lost, different lives yes, but
>> no more than would have been sacrificed otherwise.
>
> So, basically, who cares as long as it's not americans dying?
>
>
> Antti Kurenniemi
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5