| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: [OS2HW] VIA vs NVIDIA |
Hello Jim At this point I can't give you certainty but I can give you some odds based on these company's past records. VIA has been pretty good about handling their problems and back during the Super 7 era they gained considerable market share beating Ali in consistently higher quality. However once they rose up they have mostly played the mainstream game to maintain their position especially against Intel who entered the field with a vengeance around that time, partly due to their battles with AMD. nVidia, on the other hand has played the rogue both in their fairly long term residence in video cards and now, in mainboard chipsets as well. They have bucked both Intel and Microsoft and earned a prominent place among Mac and Linux advocates and they have done this by rapidly producing very high quality drivers for these less-than-mainstram systems. By comparison, nVidia is on the "dozenth" version of Linux drivers for video while ATi, AFAIK, has yet to produce even v1. While it may be unlikely that any manufacturer is very concerned, if concerned at all, about OS/2 (since most of them believe it is dead) it seems to me that our biggest hopes lie in the facts that especially in Europe and Asia many Linux fans are also OS/2 fans and realize their common posix/unix roots. I am not a driver programmer but I understand it is fairly easy to port from Linux to OS/2 and that is how, for example, we got SBLive support when Creative dumped us. The odds aren't particularly good for us in any case but it certainly helps that Linux/BSD systems are growing rapidly in popularity and that nVidia seems very interested in earning loyalty from power users who more and more choose alternative systems. I'll be interested to see comments from those whove actually installed OS/2-eCs on both VIA and nVidia since up until now, the latest system upon which I've installed OS/2 is an Intel 440BX chipset. Filled with ram and with a hard drive accellerator it still rocks *real* hard. Jimmy > Is it worth asking which of these is preferred for an OS/2-eCS mobo? If > so, which? > > Jim L, via eCS 1.15 version of OS/2 > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/9rHolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/os2hardware/ To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: os2hardware-unsubscribe{at}yahoogroups.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ ---* Origin: Waldo's Place USA Internet Gateway (1:3634/1000) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786 @PATH: 3634/1000 12 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.