Path:
number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!nntp.infostrada.it!area.cu.mi.it!diesel.cu.mi.it!seltaeb.ghgcorp.com!rmb-mod
From: "Brian" 
Newsgroups: rec.music.beatles.moderated,rec.music.beatles
Subject: Re: LOVE Album Song Dissection
Followup-To: rec.music.beatles.moderated
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:36:07 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 33
Approved: rmbm-request{at}seltaeb.ghgcorp.com
Message-ID: 
References: 
   
   
NNTP-Posting-Host: seltaeb.ghgcorp.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: tdi.cu.mi.it 1171902967 28661 69.44.227.18 (19 Feb 2007 16:36:07 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse{at}diesel.cu.mi.it
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 16:36:07 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: G2/1.0
Complaints-To: groups-abuse{at}google.com
Injection-Info: a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=203.177.32.12;
   posting-account=SaXbFQ0AAAD37_ep3pIqodYAvsI4llbu
Originator: rmb-mod{at}seltaeb.ghgcorp.com
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com rec.music.beatles.moderated:17110
rec.music.beatles:1044727

I apologize for not being too accurate, I was drafting this when I was
thinking "horns" but "trumpet" was brought up in my mind.

While I also respect some opinions regarding how the Love album as
blasphemy, hopefully this thread will just be about the songs.

Also, as people give their contributions or corrections, I wil compile
them once in a while for the benefit of everyone.


On Feb 18, 5:07 am, rollee  wrote:
> I haven't heard any of the "Love" album, and don't plan to.
Let's face it, the
> last RELEASED official Beatles album of 'new' material was Let It Be.  Anthology
> was an official Beatles release, but it was a collection of outtakes from the
> recording sessions, and as such, can't really be considered to be new
material.>From what I have read, the "Love" album has taken
Beatles songs and mutilated
>
> them by mixing songs together.  I guess some would consider this to be an art
> form, and I guess it is, but really, to take classic Beatles songs, and then
> mutilate them in the name of art is what I would consider to be blasphemy.  The
> Beatles should have never authorized such an endeavour.
>
> --
>
> All follow-ups are directed to the newsgroup rec.music.beatles.moderated.    
> If your follow-up more properly belongs in the unmoderated newsgroup, please
> change your headers appropriately.   -- the moderators


--

All follow-ups are directed to the newsgroup rec.music.beatles.moderated.    
If your follow-up more properly belongs in the unmoderated newsgroup, please 
change your headers appropriately.   -- the moderators
---
 þ Derby City GateWorks:  UUCP  FidoNet